Quantcast The Red and Black
College Media Network

The Red and Black

Search the Archives

 

Court orders former reporter to reveal Soloski case sources (w/documents)

Abstract:
The state's largest newspaper is now involved in a University journalism professor's fight to clear his name of harassment charges. A district court ordered a deposition for Kelly Simmons, a former Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter and current University employee, to reveal the identities of sources she used in a June 2005 story about the Office of Legal Affairs' investigation in claims against John Soloski, a Grady College professor and former dean....

  • Displaying 1 - 8 of 8

Irony

posted 2/06/09 @ 8:08 AM EST

The former Dean of the Journalism School and current journalism professor is subpoena-ing a reporter's confidential sources--one of the tenets that journalists still hold dear. This will be interesting if the reporter and the AJC decide not to reveal.

nobody important

posted 2/06/09 @ 8:48 AM EST

this guy is a walking disaster of a horndog that seeks to manipulate everyone with whom he comes in contact.

inside source

posted 2/06/09 @ 11:38 AM EST

Soloski should have been fired for incompetence, alcoholic behavior and a failure to to lead. UGA botched it when they enabled him to stay around, be a leach and continue whining!!

Bob

posted 2/06/09 @ 12:56 PM EST

Bottom line: He was cleared of the charges. Makding false accusations is a serious crime. Now the people who made those false charges should lose their jobs and go to jail. Kudos to this guy for not lying down, fighting back, proving his innocence, and restoring his name. He should get his old job back, or get financial restitution.

In the Know

posted 2/06/09 @ 5:01 PM EST

Originally posted by

Bob

Bottom line: He was cleared of the charges. Makding false accusations is a serious crime. Now the people who made those false charges should lose their jobs and go to jail. Kudos to this guy for not lying down, fighting back, proving his innocence, and restoring his name. He should get his old job back, or get financial restitution.


He was not cleared of these charges because the university botched the investigation and he agreed to resign as dean, come back as a full prof making a salary equivalent to the highest salary of a full professor before the case could actually play out as it should have.

And just because a judge reccommends that he be cleared doesn't mean he's actually been cleared. The statement he made is actually discriminatory and creates a hostile work environment. I blame the university for trying to run him out and using this harassment claim to do it when there were other reasons.

Bob

posted 2/06/09 @ 10:18 PM EST

Wrong. No conviction = innocent until PROVEN guilty. And when a JUDGE recommends clearing someone (meaning retract the charges), believe me, not only does that mean there was no legal case against this man and that he is innocent, it means there was never any basis for the false allegations to begin with.

He needs to file suit, be compensated for the damage done, and the person who made the false charges either needs to prove the charges or be fired, and also go to jail.

Pele

posted 2/06/09 @ 11:35 PM EST

I regret that UGA didn't do this job right the first time. There are a dozen reasons why Soloski should have been fired, and the allegations aren't false.

Owl Jolson

posted 2/07/09 @ 1:07 PM EST

I love to singa!
  • Displaying 1 - 8 of 8

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

 

 

Advertisement

Poll

Hmm, what to make of Kentucky vs. Georgia:
Submit Vote

View Results



Advertisement