Search the Archives
Abstract:
Of the 27 student arrests that have occurred since Monday, 25 students - including seven freshmen - were arrested on alcohol-related charges. The students were arrested on charges of underage possession and consumption of alcohol, driving under the influence or open container....
Originally posted byBryan
So when a Red and Black staffer gets arrested, their picture will be in the paper right?
Originally posted byAustin
good way to defame the characters of 7 people, maybe you should meet them before you make a circus out of their situation. its not as if they didnt feel bad enough or werent in enough trouble already.
Originally posted bySara Hinson
What an extraordinarily cruel tactic to use against kids on thier first few days away from home.
Originally posted byPam Smith
Ken, make that 5 years!!
Originally posted byMatthew Sheahan
Not only is it a completely excessive abuse of police power to arrest people for underage possession of alcohol, I think it is unfortunate that the Red & Black has chosen to run these photos. Mug shot photos should be reserved for those accused of serious crimes, and I'm sorry, but underage possession of alcohol is not a serious crime. Please seriously reconsider this editorial decision.
Originally posted byMatthew Sheahan
Not only is it a completely excessive abuse of police power to arrest people for underage possession of alcohol, I think it is unfortunate that the Red & Black has chosen to run these photos. Mug shot photos should be reserved for those accused of serious crimes, and I'm sorry, but underage possession of alcohol is not a serious crime. Please seriously reconsider this editorial decision.
Originally posted byget over it
Ever since Lewis Fish died, this University has an even worse reputation for underage drinking.
Originally posted byR
This sentence was in the staff editorial:
"We hope you help the start of this school year follow a different course. For once in your life, you've got a clean slate ... all but seven of you, that is. Use it wisely."
I thought newspapers were supposed to be unbiased, as opposed to vindictive and judgmental.
Originally posted byAG
I agree with those who say that these freshmen are suffering the consequences for their actions. Underage drinking is illegal; I knew it when I did it, and hopefully those cited in the article know, too. Do the crime, get caught, do the time.
However, my only question is why the Red and Black only posted the pictures of the freshmen. I thought there were 27 arrests? Would it have not been more fair either to post pictures of all 27 or of no one at all? The point of the article was the overall number of arrests in the first week, not how many freshmen were arrested. As soon as they only posted the pictures of the freshmen, it went from being an article that stated the facts to being an article with an agenda.
Originally posted byClay Kimbro
I am seeing some particularly alarming arguments on here...
don't blame the cops they are just doing their job...instead blame the press...
Well the press is just doing their job. If they did not find a way to communicate the story it might lead many other freshmen to believe this behavior goes mostly unpunished.
There is no defamation, much less malice, in this story. It reported facts that students were arrested and for what reasons they were arrested. In no way did it say they were guilty or imply they were guilty in a court of law. Printing a mug shot should not let you presume guilt. However, it is important for a newspaper to examine stories like this, because it communicates to the public who is getting arrested and why they are getting arrested, which enables the public to question if laws are fair or unfair and later if the courts judgments are fair and just or incorrect.
I will say this though... while the article did not mention that every individual listed and photographed were arrested for each thing listed (dui, open container, underage consumption and possession), it would be more clearly communicated to the public if each individuals charges/reasons for arrest were listed. That way no one can incorrectly assume that each of these individuals were arrested for driving under the influence. Even then thats to prevent people from making assumptions, its a far cry from being incorrect, defamation or malice.
and Mr. Rosenberg....Shame on you!
You should be careful before you use your "experience" to talk down to staff at the Red & Black. For starters you are not present at our college, our city, or our society/culture to understand what needs to be reported or not. I would argue they are serving their university by reporting the reality of what happens when people drink underage in Athens, GA so others are aware of reality and consequences and publicly debate whether those consequences are just or not. (but I suppose at Penn State you just preferred Happy shiny fluff stories rather than reality or maybe limiting these stories just to football players like the current online headline of the Penn State collegiate)
The reality or our local culture is in the past couple of years the public in Georgia, Athens, and nearby Atlanta is turning more against college drinking and the potential problems it causes. It is currently affecting policy changes at both our university and the local government (Athens-Clarke County). The real story here is the policy change (which was mentioned) and the effects and implementation of it. Only when the public is aware of its effects can they debate how fair the policies are or how well they work, much less any debate/public opinions on pre-existing laws. I can not think of a better way for the Red & Black to communicate the new policy, show how its implemented, and the effects of its policy than to run this story and future follow-ups of what happens to these individuals in court and university judiciary hearings.
Bryan
posted 8/17/07 @ 10:32 AM EST