Quantcast The Red and Black
College Media Network

The Red and Black

Search the Archives

 

Weapons can provide defense

Abstract:
Recently, the University Police issued the Campus Weapons Policy, banning weapons on campus. As a former staff member, current graduate student, active hunter, Georgia Firearms License holder and proponent of concealed carry, I feel this policy is baseless, discriminatory and counter-productive....

  • Displaying 1 - 13 of 13

GB

posted 8/28/08 @ 7:28 AM EST

Well said. Guns don't kill people, people kill people.

BC

posted 8/28/08 @ 11:21 AM EST

Originally posted by

GB

Well said. Guns don't kill people, people kill people.


Correction: People with guns kill people... the guns are useless by themselves.

Zaid

posted 8/28/08 @ 4:57 PM EST

Originally posted by

GB

Well said. Guns don't kill people, people kill people.


Yeah I remember when a guy I know down the street put his fingers together and yelled, "Pew Pew" and it ended up killing five people.

dont worry

posted 8/28/08 @ 9:04 AM EST

Oh, don't you worry about a thing. Those University Police officers with their jacked up (and in my opinion completely necessary) F-250's will take care of you, no problem.

David

posted 8/28/08 @ 9:55 AM EST

I completely agree with Glenn's article. I am a senior undergraduate and also a holder of a concealed carry permit. I understand the weapons policy and completely agree with its goals and intentions. However, it does nothing to enhance the safety on campus, but rather to inhibit the ability of students to protect themselves.

Some would argue that as students we are not responsible or mature enough to be allowed to have a weapon with us. Well, the reality is that there is an enormous probability that you have seen a UGA student who is legally possessing a firearm--you just didn't know it. That's the point of a CONCEALED weapon license. Outside the realm of UGA we are considered old enough, mature enough, and responsible enough to be granted this right guaranteed us as legal citizens by our Bill of Rights. After all, if one goes through the process for obtaining a Georgia firearms license then he or she should be allowed the privileges and protections afforded by that license. It's like saying that once you pass the driving test and get your drivers license you can drive all over Athens...except while on campus. Improper use of a vehicle can be just as dangerous, if not more so, than a firearm. And it's not extremely easy or quick to obtain this permit. A recent article in the AJC by Alice Johnson stated that a license could be obtained by "anyone who can pass a fingerprint background check and pay the $15 application fee." The process is a bit more complex than Ms. Johnson would have us believe. In its entirety, the application process takes about 3-4 months. The applicant must be at least 21 years old with a clean criminal record. As for the fee, $15 is only the application fee and does not include the price of the GBI/FBI background check that takes the majority of the waiting time to complete--so the total is actually closer to $50, an amount that most college students don't have to spare on something as trivial as this.

The most ridiculous part of the policy is that it is not applied equally to all of us on campus. I know many who fall under the category of faculty, staff, and most certainly visitors whom I would less likely trust with a firearm than most of my peers. However, they can legally have one on campus, while we are to remain defenseless. No offense to the UGA or Athens-Clarke County Police Departments, but they cannot be everywhere at once and are unlikely to make any difference in the first few minutes of a confrontation. Besides, they're just too damn busy arresting underage drinkers to worry with us. It just seems illogical that I could have a gun locked in my truck the morning of graduation and be guilty of a felony; but if it's not discovered until after I leave Sanford then it's perfectly legal since I possess a firearms license and am no longer a student. How does that in any way make sense?

There are also provisions of the policy that are absurd in any regard. Most pocket knives are prohibited and, let's face it, there aren't too many males in the south that don't have a pocket knife. Technically kitchen knives are also illegal, so I suppose we should all plan on eating homecooked meats in very large pieces. And last year a student received a felony charge for being in possession of a baseball bat that he used at the IM fields (yes he had another weapon as well, but in that case why charge him for having the bat? The other weapon I'm sure would have been much more effective.). These are things that I would trust my middle school-aged cousin to have, but according to our administration we as adults have no right to them.

All things considered, I have felt extremely safe at UGA. But it never hurts to have a backup plan in case things don't go the way the University intends them to; and how often does that actually happen anyway?

Stacie

posted 8/28/08 @ 10:51 AM EST

Originally posted by

David

I completely agree with Glenn's article. I am a senior undergraduate and also a holder of a concealed carry permit. I understand the weapons policy and completely agree with its goals and intentions. However, it does nothing to enhance the safety on campus, but rather to inhibit the ability of students to protect themselves.

Some would argue that as students we are not responsible or mature enough to be allowed to have a weapon with us. Well, the reality is that there is an enormous probability that you have seen a UGA student who is legally possessing a firearm--you just didn't know it. That's the point of a CONCEALED weapon license. Outside the realm of UGA we are considered old enough, mature enough, and responsible enough to be granted this right guaranteed us as legal citizens by our Bill of Rights. After all, if one goes through the process for obtaining a Georgia firearms license then he or she should be allowed the privileges and protections afforded by that license. It's like saying that once you pass the driving test and get your drivers license you can drive all over Athens...except while on campus. Improper use of a vehicle can be just as dangerous, if not more so, than a firearm. And it's not extremely easy or quick to obtain this permit. A recent article in the AJC by Alice Johnson stated that a license could be obtained by "anyone who can pass a fingerprint background check and pay the $15 application fee." The process is a bit more complex than Ms. Johnson would have us believe. In its entirety, the application process takes about 3-4 months. The applicant must be at least 21 years old with a clean criminal record. As for the fee, $15 is only the application fee and does not include the price of the GBI/FBI background check that takes the majority of the waiting time to complete--so the total is actually closer to $50, an amount that most college students don't have to spare on something as trivial as this.

The most ridiculous part of the policy is that it is not applied equally to all of us on campus. I know many who fall under the category of faculty, staff, and most certainly visitors whom I would less likely trust with a firearm than most of my peers. However, they can legally have one on campus, while we are to remain defenseless. No offense to the UGA or Athens-Clarke County Police Departments, but they cannot be everywhere at once and are unlikely to make any difference in the first few minutes of a confrontation. Besides, they're just too damn busy arresting underage drinkers to worry with us. It just seems illogical that I could have a gun locked in my truck the morning of graduation and be guilty of a felony; but if it's not discovered until after I leave Sanford then it's perfectly legal since I possess a firearms license and am no longer a student. How does that in any way make sense?

There are also provisions of the policy that are absurd in any regard. Most pocket knives are prohibited and, let's face it, there aren't too many males in the south that don't have a pocket knife. Technically kitchen knives are also illegal, so I suppose we should all plan on eating homecooked meats in very large pieces. And last year a student received a felony charge for being in possession of a baseball bat that he used at the IM fields (yes he had another weapon as well, but in that case why charge him for having the bat? The other weapon I'm sure would have been much more effective.). These are things that I would trust my middle school-aged cousin to have, but according to our administration we as adults have no right to them.

All things considered, I have felt extremely safe at UGA. But it never hurts to have a backup plan in case things don't go the way the University intends them to; and how often does that actually happen anyway?



This is a really, really strong argument! I haven't seen two better arguments on this topic in quite some time until I picked up the paper today and also saw your comment on here.

Keep arguing your side, as many people are behind you!

Glenn

posted 8/28/08 @ 2:58 PM EST

Thanks David. You make some great points. Cars are much more dangerous than guns. Please consider writing this up and submitting to R&B for publication.

Glenn

NRA

posted 8/28/08 @ 1:21 PM EST

Well said. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

Timothee Atouba

posted 8/28/08 @ 2:35 PM EST

"as I frequently hunt before or after class"

I laughed pretty hard at this.

I also misread the title of this article: "Women can provide defense."

Laura

posted 8/28/08 @ 2:57 PM EST

I think there was a discussion very similar to this last spring in the Red and Black comment section. At that time, a number of people offered arguments in favor of allowing concealed weapons on campus. I offered an argument against, and I'll offer it again here.

The primary argument made in support of carrying concealed weapons is that the owner will be able to intervene in the event of a horrible scenario such as occurred at Virginia Tech. I definitely understand this point. At our core, it speaks to the horror we feel at being indiscriminately targeted by a disturbed individual who cares nothing about his victims. But, the presence of concealed weapons on campus is no guarantee that we will escape this fate, and it is very unclear exactly how well concealed weapons will prevent this kind of violence.

Individuals who commit these kinds of campus horrors will not be deterred by the possible presence of concealed weapons. If someone is determined to carry out a horrible act, they will find a way to do it. Last spring, a South Carolina high school student was caught with enough materials to make a bomb. Fortunately, his parents were tipped off and called police, but this situation indicates the determined and disturbed nature of people who are capable of committing crimes like this. A concealed weapon will do no good against a concealed bomb.

Apart from the extreme example of campus violence, others suggest that concealed weapons will deter more common crimes. I have heard arguments from proponents of concealed weapons permits suggesting that, because of my opposition, I am a sheep who can only blame myself if I find myself the victim of a crime. But, for those who wish to carry concealed weapons as a crime deterrent, how will you decide when to use your weapon? Trained police officers often have difficulties judging when force is necessary. How will you know when you are justified? How far are you willing to go when confronted with a questionable situation? Can you trust yourself not to become emotionally charged? I wonder whether Ricky Gear of Bogart asked himself those questions before the tragic events of last spring. The truth of that story may never be known, but, in the end, BJ Mough was shot in the back. This is a tragic example of how firearms exacerbated a situation and took a life. My argument against concealed weapons on campus asks that we leave law enforcement to those who are trained for it, and exercise caution, rather than aggression, for campus safety.

Glenn

posted 8/28/08 @ 5:55 PM EST

Laura,

Thanks for commenting. You bring up some valid points. Personally, I believe that the type of folks that carry out these sort of attacks (VA Tech, Columbine, etc) are cowards. That is why they target groups of unarmed civilians. They are scared to death of confrontation, and often commit suicide rather than engage law enforcement. I think the idea that some of those civilians might be armed would be an effective deterrant for this type of behavior. I concede that concealed firearms won't do much good against a bomb, but that is an apples to oranges comparison.

You also make a good point about justification. For me, carrying a firearm means carrying additional responsibilty. It means I have to be a better person, and can't get involved in petty arguments. It means that I let personal insults slide, and I always walk away from fights. The weapon is the last line of defense, and will only be drawn if I feel my life (or the life of someone around me) is threatened. Even then, it will be drawn as a deterrant, and fired only if that threat to life becomes immenant. You imply that carrying a firearm is an aggressive behavior, and (in my case) you could not be more wrong. It is a defensive and cautious behavior meant to deter or prevent extreme act of aggression.

Unfortunately, there is no way to ensure that all GFL (concealed carry permit) holders abide by similar personal codes. I'm sure you can find many instances where guns were drawn and fired under questionable circumstance (like the one you described). I'm sure I can find many instances where guns were drawn and fired to save the lives of innocents from legitimate threats. What can you do? Should my rights be infringed upon, because someone can't control themselves? People make poor decisions behind the steering wheel everyday. You would be amazed by the number of annual traffic deaths in this country (look it up, and compare it to annual firearm related deaths!). Would you agree that it is irrational to curtail our driving priveledges, because of the poor decisions others have made?

Anyway, I appreciate you sharing your point of view, and I hope that folks on my side of the issue will take the time to think about the points you raised. Likewise, I hope you maintain an open mind, and give our points the same consideration.

Glenn
(How about adding a spell check feature on this thing!)


Originally posted by

Laura

I think there was a discussion very similar to this last spring in the Red and Black comment section. At that time, a number of people offered arguments in favor of allowing concealed weapons on campus. I offered an argument against, and I'll offer it again here.

The primary argument made in support of carrying concealed weapons is that the owner will be able to intervene in the event of a horrible scenario such as occurred at Virginia Tech. I definitely understand this point. At our core, it speaks to the horror we feel at being indiscriminately targeted by a disturbed individual who cares nothing about his victims. But, the presence of concealed weapons on campus is no guarantee that we will escape this fate, and it is very unclear exactly how well concealed weapons will prevent this kind of violence.

Individuals who commit these kinds of campus horrors will not be deterred by the possible presence of concealed weapons. If someone is determined to carry out a horrible act, they will find a way to do it. Last spring, a South Carolina high school student was caught with enough materials to make a bomb. Fortunately, his parents were tipped off and called police, but this situation indicates the determined and disturbed nature of people who are capable of committing crimes like this. A concealed weapon will do no good against a concealed bomb.

Apart from the extreme example of campus violence, others suggest that concealed weapons will deter more common crimes. I have heard arguments from proponents of concealed weapons permits suggesting that, because of my opposition, I am a sheep who can only blame myself if I find myself the victim of a crime. But, for those who wish to carry concealed weapons as a crime deterrent, how will you decide when to use your weapon? Trained police officers often have difficulties judging when force is necessary. How will you know when you are justified? How far are you willing to go when confronted with a questionable situation? Can you trust yourself not to become emotionally charged? I wonder whether Ricky Gear of Bogart asked himself those questions before the tragic events of last spring. The truth of that story may never be known, but, in the end, BJ Mough was shot in the back. This is a tragic example of how firearms exacerbated a situation and took a life. My argument against concealed weapons on campus asks that we leave law enforcement to those who are trained for it, and exercise caution, rather than aggression, for campus safety.

Mike

posted 8/29/08 @ 3:41 AM EST

Every time you hear about a shooting at a school or college all the gun ban freaks want to use it as an excuse to run thier mouths and try to make it a crusade to take away our right to bear arms. You know what. If more of us were allowed to carry a gun maybe when something like this does happen while waiting for the police to get there. Unless there happens to be one already present in which case the shooter would just wait till he leaves to go on his shooting spree. Someone carrying could possably take the shooter down and save no telling how many lives. I not only firmy believe in the right to bear arms. But along with that right. I believe in the right to use what ever force neccassary to defend ones self, family, property, and fellow American. But like you said They keep comming up with these stupid gun laws that only serve to take away our rights as Americans. And only hurt law abiding citizens. Ok like you said I can see the reason for this law. But the criminal cared about the law he would not be a criminal in the first place.

weapons on campus

posted 3/08/09 @ 1:11 AM EST

In my humble opinion, this Law is NOT about protecting students, but rather about protecting the Universities from law suits. Does the word l i a b i l i t y ring any bells?

(The action by the University Police comes after the one-year anniversary of the shooting rampage at Virginia Tech that left 32 dead.)
This statement is nothing more than pablem being spoon fed to the fear mongers, and weaklings who still believe that guns kill people. Why doesn't the University Police grow some Kahonies and do something about the number of rapes that happen on campuses, like outlawing penis's on campus? or do something about the alcohol problem so many students have?
  • Displaying 1 - 13 of 13

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

 

 

Advertisement

Poll

Hmm, what to make of Kentucky vs. Georgia:
Submit Vote

View Results



Advertisement