Search the Archives
Abstract:
Student comments on a recent national survey point to a central theme - the University's advising process needs help.
The National Survey on Student Engagement asked nearly 1,000
freshmen and 1,000 seniors about different aspects of the University. Of the 280 write-in student comments, 30 responded negatively about advising....
Originally posted byAlumna 06
I was an engineering major, and I had an awesome advisor.
Originally posted byBrent
Wow. Less than a third of a percent of the respondents commented negatively on advising, clearly meriting the headline "UGA students say advising process inefficient."
Originally posted byEvan
I love this one from a senior:
ban fraternities and sororities. close bars in town. make learning a foreign language mandatory or study abroad compulsive. close minded, irresponsible and contemptous student body. litte to offer academically and culturally. something must be done for the university's sake.
Sounds like they want the school to turn into a factory. I have no problem with stressing international experience, but geez, sounds like someone didn't have much of a social life here.
Originally posted byJack
"including improving student understanding of what academic advising is and is not"
Wow, so the first suggestion for improving advising is to lower students expectations of what advising is.
Originally posted byMary
30 students complain about advising on a survey of a few thousand? That's nothing. I'm willing to bet that the problem was with the 30 students, not with their advisors. How about a more accurate headline, R&B?
Originally posted byMichael
Advisers are in it to do they're job for their pay check and nothing more. Now I am not saying that advisers are horrible people; just that the majority need to have their priorities rechecked and straightened. However, it is conceited to think that an adviser is there for the students because they CARE for a students' well-being. It is blatantly obvious that they treat students with higher GPAs differently to those that possess lower GPAs. Although I have no problem with that, this creates unfair advantages and makes an adviser's job...shall we say, less difficult. After all, why would they care to apply effort to students who show less potential (lower GPAs)? I personally think that advisers are there to make sure you sign up for classes at UGA, so that you can pay UGA tuition, so that UGA can keep charging its students bull-crap fees. After all, the University of Georgia is a Business. What brings in more money: A plethora of Football tickets and fans, or the bright student that has unlocked potential? I'd put my money on the Football. But after losing to Tech, I don't see what UGA has to offer apart from a liver of steel.
Originally posted byNikita
I actually think advising needs to be scaled down. I am now a grad student, married to an undergrad who transferred in with an undegraduate degree and a tech degree -- between us, we've been at UGA for about 12 years. In all that time, and in those two situations, advising has remained largely the same, and a waste of time. Nearly every time I pull up OASIS and my degree requirement sheet, decide what I want to do, and have my advisor sign off on it with no significant input into the selection process.
There are times when you need an advisor. When you're new to your major, new to the university, trying to work out credit transfers, or close to graduation, you may need help. But most of the time you don't, and that visit to your advisor is just a hurdle to actually getting registered.
Alumna 06
posted 12/03/08 @ 8:27 AM EST