Quantcast The Red and Black
College Media Network

The Red and Black

Search the Archives

 

Jewish author lectures, defends Palestine

Abstract:
he granddaughter of Holocaust survivors and a former West Bank resident spoke against Israel's occupation of Palestine Tuesday night.

Hosted by Athens for Justice in Palestine, Anna Baltzer's lecture was one of many in her book tour.

She wrote the book, "Witness in Palestine: A Jewish American Woman in the Occupied Territories," to bring attention to the plight of Palestinians....

  • Displaying 1 - 22 of 22

MajorPayne

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:42 AM EST

I know that people are justified on both sides to the violence that we see on the news every day. From what I read of this article, It appears as if Ms. Baltzer is opposed to a nation building defensive walls along its borders. I am sorry for those palestinians who have to endure many hours at the crossings, yet it is essential when we have seen so many suicide bombings and rocket attacks in the past. A nation has the right and even the moral obligation to defend itself and secure its own borders.

The plight of the palestinian people, I believe, is made worse by the actions of a few and the nonaction of surrounding Muslim countries. These people live in an eternal refugee area where violence and poverty hold power. There is little hope for these people. Either a separate state is established where law and order are put into effect or the people can be assimilated into countries they had formerly been citizens of.

Joanne Moston

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:53 AM EST

If the wall was no the border it would be acceptable, but it is often many kilometers inside the 1967 border of the West Bank,and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are on the Israeli side of the wall. IF the wall was for security it would be built on the border. In reality, it is a land grab, causing extreme misery to the Palestinians who are displaced.

Leonidas

posted 3/05/08 @ 2:12 PM EST

Ms. Baltzer strikes me as a traitor to her own people. It is regrettable what has happened to the Palestinians. However, being the granddaughter of Holocaust survivors, I wonder if Ms. Baltzer was aware of how much antisemitism existed among Palestinians even before the current state of Israel was refounded. In the documentary www.obsessionthemovie.com, the most chilling part of this documentary, which has been banned on many college campuses, was the part that covered events during World War II. The then Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, visited and met with Hitler a number of times. He was so enthusiastic and wanted to be a part of what the Nazis were doing regarding the Jews, that he helped fund and raise a Division of S.S. troops comprised entirely of Bosnian Muslims to help them in the Final Solution.
There was footage of the Mufti talking with Hitler and photos and footage of a field of Muslim S.S. troops praying with Nazi uniforms and fez hats with the German eagle on them. So I have to ask Ms Baltzer how far she will go in denouncing her own people's attempts at protecting their populace against continued terrorism. Will she be weeping or cheering the day when Amadinejad of Iran drops a nuke on Tel-Aviv?

Jim

posted 3/05/08 @ 3:56 PM EST

Anti-Semitism as we know it is a Christian creation. And it still is. The worst anti-Semites in the world are American Christians who want to collect Jews in Israel in order to bring about the so-called end times.

Muneer

posted 3/05/08 @ 5:17 PM EST

MajorP:
1) We should never accept violence as being justified
2) Do you watch the news? the Wall has NOT prevented rocket attacks, and Hamas renounced suicide bombings after it ran for elections back in 2006.
3) The refugees were created by and continue to be created by israeli policies.
4) You presume Palestinians didnt exist before israel was created, when in actuality there were people in the region who identified themselves as Palestinians INCLUDING Palestinian Jews. And for your plan to be completely effective, it seems only fair to ask all Jews to assimilate back into Europe, the Americas, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Lets leave the region to the Arabs.

Leonidas:
You are an idiot.
FYI: More Jews were accomplices to Hitler than were Palestinians. Does that mean we should dismiss any Jewish claim today? Ms. Baltzer argued for humanity, not for misconceived nationalism.

Dmitry

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:03 PM EST

Originally posted by

Muneer

MajorP:


Leonidas:
You are an idiot.
FYI: More Jews were accomplices to Hitler than were Palestinians. Does that mean we should dismiss any Jewish claim today? Ms. Baltzer argued for humanity, not for misconceived nationalism.



Jews were accomplices to Hitler? You have no credibility here.

Point is, Hamas and other terrorist organizations are doing far more damage to Palestinians than the so-called Israeli occupation (a misnomer if I ever heard one). Any semblance of a legitimate government by the Palestinians will go a long way towards achieving their goals as opposed to playing the victim card, when in fact their terrorist leaders are the aggressors.

As far as leaving the Middle East to the Arabs, or however you put, that's not the solution and that's not happening. Jews aren't leaving Israel anytime soon so you and other Arabs might have to think of a better long-term peace plan.

Muneer

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:33 PM EST

Dmitry:

Its moronic of you to accuse Hamas of doing more damage to its own people than israel. The #1 OFFENSE and ACT OF AGGRESSION in the region is the OCCUPATION/COLONIZATION. All the regions ills stem from it and israel's continued policy to maintain it (you may believe Hamas is an ill of the region--well the occupation created them as well). Hamas actually attempted to become that legitimate government you allude to, but their entrance into the political world and subsequent democratic victory was met by an israeli, US, and European boycott over ALL Palestinians, leading to an increase in the man-made poverty crippling their economy(another ill stemming from the occupation).

(Yes there were European Jews that aided the Nazi campaign in order to save themselves? More than the ONE Palestinian that zionists always refer to. And maybe Leonidiot should examine the role of Albanian Muslims in WWII before spreading propaganda about Bosnian ones)

Jason Coleman

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:40 PM EST

Muneer:

ALL of the problems of the region stem from the creation of Israel? So Israel is why Iraq invaded Iran in the 80s? Or why the government of Sudan is committing genocide in Darfur? Or why Rafik Hariri and Pierre Gemayel (the younger) were assassinated in Lebanon? Is Israel the reason that there are ZERO established democracies in Arab countries?

Muneer

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:52 PM EST

I said the OCCUPATION/COLONIZATION is the stem of all the region's ills. But if you want to equate the State of israel to those, sure I wont argue.

And by region you know I mean Palestine. Once again I am responding to other posts. I was responding to a post talking exclusively about Palestinians helping themselves, so when I said "region" I was referring to Palestine. Read before you post.

Jason Coleman

posted 3/05/08 @ 9:09 PM EST

When we've spoken before (and I'm sorry you don't remember my name; I'm sure if you saw me you'd recognize me), you have stated your support for a binational state. But even if you did mean Israel + Palestinian Territories, you know enough to realize that when a person says "the region," people usually mean the Middle East as a whole.

But if it's true that Israel's control over the West Bank and Gaza is the root of the problems in the area, why is there still violence emanating from Gaza? Israel completely withdrew in 2005, as was certified by the United Nations. How does the launching of rockets into the civilian cities of Sderot and now Ashkelon contribute to ending the so-called occupation?

Muneer

posted 3/05/08 @ 9:22 PM EST

GAZA:
1) israel controls all the borders thus all its activities with the outer world, and this control has been used to make Gaza the largest open air prison.

2) israel controls all the airspace. It has also destroyed a Gaza airport being built by European nations twice (dont want people flying out of their prison?)

3) israel controls all the natural resources. People of Gaza are rationed water while their israeli neighbors sunbathe on plush green lawns besides swimming pools (in a desert?!)

4) israel repeatedly invades Gaza to execute "suspected terrorists", arrest Palestinians, destroy entire villages (Rafah), and bomb the civilian population (over 100 killed and double that injured last week alone).

5) Gaza is part of Palestine and Hamas represents all Palestinians (they were democratically elected to do so), thus just because the ILLEGAL settlers left the stolen land they colonized in Gaza doesn't erase the fact that the West Bank is still being colonized. Gaza is not a separate entity from the West Bank, they are both Palestine.

Jason Coleman

posted 3/05/08 @ 9:53 PM EST

I'll go line-by-line.

1.) Israel does not control all of the borders, only the one with Israel. You may remember the media coverage a week or two ago of Hamas terrorists blowing up the wall between Egypt and Gaza, allowing al-Qaeda to enter Gaza.

2.) True, Israel does control the airspace. That's why terrorists launch rockets into Israeli cities from Gaza? How does that help alleviate the situation?

3.) While Israel controls the natural resource, it also supplies the Palestinians with their utilities. Even though the Palestinian government (even under Fatah) fell way behind in paying the companies, power and water service continue basically uninterrupted.

4.) Why does Israel invade Gaza? Because the violence continued even after the Disengagement. No more Palestinian violence, no more Israeli incursions. It's that simple. You can't say otherwise - history has borne it out.

5.) The fact that Gaza and the West Bank are both considered the Palestinian Territories doesn't justify the rocket attacks. If the only issue was Israeli control and neighborhoods in the West Bank, then why do attacks occur in Israel proper? Why not just attack the people you label "colonizers?"

As for your statement about Hamas being "democratically" elected. A government is democratically elected does not mean it's still not made up of terrorists. US and EU law prevents the governments from dealing with terrorist organizations. Hamas was given an out if their government had abided by the standards set by the international community, things spelled out by the Oslo Accords: recognize Israel's right to exist, renounce terrorism (they didn't have to stop it, but renounce its legitimacy), and accept prior agreements with Israel. Hamas refused to do any of those. What's especially ironic is that the prior agreements created the very Palestinian Authority whose elections Hamas won.

Muneer

posted 3/05/08 @ 11:03 PM EST

Apparently you can post shit on this site and no one will stop you. SHIT SHIT SHIT...see?

Ill go line by line to shed more light on you misinformation:
1) That wall that Hamas blew up in order to free its starving people, was built by ISRAEL. Israel's wall on the Egyptian/Palestinian border.

2) Airspace reference is to prove that israel still controls all of Gaza. No one can enter with aid or trade, and no one can exit with aid or trade...Humanitarian Crisis.

3) Hamas is not allowed to handle any of these "services". Its an israeli monopoly. israel intentionally forces the Palestinains to depend on it for subsistence. I suggest everyone invesitigate what happened to gaza after israel declared it an enemy entity...the subsequent cutt-off of ALL resources will prove Coleman's #3 to be a simple rubbish.

4) israel must be the most incompetent idiotic military regime ever in the history of the world if we are to accept your point in #4. Was it successful in Lebenon? Was it successful after cutting off Gaza from the rest of the wrold? Was it successful after its latest offense? If one thing is clear it is that israel cannot stop violent resistence with military might. This is why it is so easy to assume israel is simply instigating the sitiuation to furhter derail a "peace" process that was bullshit from day one.

5) israeli SETTLEMENTS and COLONIES continue to be a key issue. There are numerous forms of resistance to them and attacks related to geography are irrelevant. The groups that use violent resistance dont have the luxury of choosing desired targets, only feasible ones.

Israel is run by a terrorist government that 1) doesnt recognize Palestine, 2) doesnt comply with past agreements, and 3) wont denounce violence...in fact pereptuates violence and acts of terror daily.

Keep babbling, and Ill keep correcting.

MajorPayne

posted 3/06/08 @ 8:41 AM EST

1) Violence is justified if you are defending your own life
2) The withdrawl of Gaza was an attempt to appease some palestians yet has only backfired.
Further, the wall has helped prevent suicide bombings. Secondly, to take the promises of a terrorist organization bent on the total destruction of a sovereign state should not be taken seriously.
3)After the 1948 war for independence, Egypt and Jordan took the land that was meant for a separate palestinian state. In the '67 war the Israelis took the land from those nations. The people who lived in that area were inhabitants of those nations and are now considered refugees.
4) Why leave the region to the Arabs? What right do they have to the land? You're comment is Anti-Semetic because Jews have had a continual presence in Israel for around three thousand years. They should have the right to stay in that very tiny strip of land. The problems continue to exist because most individuals in that area of the world have been and continue to have a total hatred for Jews and will stop at nothing for their total annihilation.

[QUOTE id="66a25df7-7676-43ab-b546-662fc24b989b"]MajorP:
1) We should never accept violence as being justified
2) Do you watch the news? the Wall has NOT prevented rocket attacks, and Hamas renounced suicide bombings after it ran for elections back in 2006.
3) The refugees were created by and continue to be created by israeli policies.
4) You presume Palestinians didnt exist before israel was created, when in actuality there were people in the region who identified themselves as Palestinians INCLUDING Palestinian Jews. And for your plan to be completely effective, it seems only fair to ask all Jews to assimilate back into Europe, the Americas, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Lets leave the region to the Arabs.

Billy

posted 3/05/08 @ 6:01 PM EST

Leonidas: "Ms. Baltzer strikes me as a traitor to her own people"

Like Muneer said, it is a humanitarian issue. Look at it this way: Are Germans who denounce Hitler and their past traitors to their people?

There are many Jewish people in Israel who denounce the Zionism movement due to humanitarian reasons. Is suppressing the people the answer to peace?

Leonidas

posted 3/05/08 @ 9:49 PM EST

Billy,

Since you didn't resort to coarse name-calling, I'll reply. The Nazi era was marked by flagrant aggression and mass murder on a multi-million person scale, and involved the invasion and conquering of many different lands far from Germany.
All the Jews are doing is protecting what little sliver of land they have presently. They're not out to expand and occupy different Arab countries, except in cases such as their incursions into Lebanon or the Golan Heights of Syria to protect themselves. There are already plenty of Israeli Arabs who live in Israel and have taken part in the socio-economic improvements they can seldom find elsewhere in the Middle-East.

Had the Holocaust not happened, there would not have been a Zionist movement in the first place. The Jews simply wanted to reoccupy their ancestral lands that was taken from them by Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines and finally Muslims. The word Palestine originates from when the Romans tried to wipe out the name Israel or Judea in an attempt to exterminate the Jews and renamed it as a different country altogether.

It is unfortunate that so much of a humanitarian crisis has occurred because of the reestablishment of Israel. But the Jews have been historically hated by almost everyone both Muslim and non, and by some who claim to be Christians, regardless of whether they created their own country or not. At least Palestinians can seek refuge in other surrounding Arab countries. Jews cannot.

Originally posted by

Billy

Leonidas: "Ms. Baltzer strikes me as a traitor to her own people"

Like Muneer said, it is a humanitarian issue. Look at it this way: Are Germans who denounce Hitler and their past traitors to their people?

There are many Jewish people in Israel who denounce the Zionism movement due to humanitarian reasons. Is suppressing the people the answer to peace?

Ramprasad Choudhry

posted 3/05/08 @ 6:06 PM EST

"Either a separate state is established where law and order are put into effect or the people can be assimilated into countries they had formerly been citizens of."

MajorPayne: exactly what country were Palestinians citizens of before the occupation? They were driven into surrounding Arab countries AFTER Israel was created and they were expelled from their homes.

Ramprasad Choudhry

posted 3/05/08 @ 6:07 PM EST

"Either a separate state is established where law and order are put into effect or the people can be assimilated into countries they had formerly been citizens of."

MajorPayne: exactly what country were Palestinians citizens of before the occupation? They were driven into surrounding Arab countries AFTER Israel was created and they were expelled from their homes.

Jason Coleman

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:24 PM EST

Muneer:

I hope law school is going well for you. From what I remember when we had a nice, vigorous discussion at Tate a few years ago, you're much better informed that you come off on your post. When you say that, "Do you watch the news? the Wall has NOT prevented rocket attacks, and Hamas renounced suicide bombings after it ran for elections back in 2006," you KNOW that these are separate issues. The "wall" you speak of (which is actually 95% fence, 5% wall) was designed to stop suicide bombings coming from the West Bank, which it has with very few exceptions. The Kassam (and now Katyusha) rockets come from Gaza. The Security Fence was never supposed to stop those.

Additionally, and this is directed toward Joanne, there is no official border separating Israel proper and the West Bank. The "Green Line" marks the armistice lines in 1949 - the territory West was controlled by Israeli forces and East by Jordanian. There will be no official borders unless mutually agreed upon by Israel and the PLO (as per the Oslo Accords). The land is and and will remain "disputed" until such an agreement is reached. The fence is also portable, meaning it can be moved based on the final border lines.

Back to Muneer: The so-called "Palestinians" of the pre-1948 Middle East were actually the Jews. Golda Meir's passport said "Palestinian" on it. There was a Jewish newspaper called the "Palestinian Post." It is now known as the "Jerusalem Post." The fact is, as you well know, there has never been an independent state called Palestine.

Finally, the refugee problem could have been avoided had the Arab states accepted the UN resolution creating two separate states. The Arab state would have been bigger than what is currently known as Gaza and the West Bank. Arab governments actually encouraged the Arabs who lived in what is now Israel, telling them to leave because of the fighting but that they could soon return.

Muneer

posted 3/05/08 @ 8:49 PM EST

My last post, because this is a dangerous avenue for many ppl (many of those above) to spread misinformation.

Jason:
1) All my points were in response to the previous posts, so I know it may be painful, but read the posts I am responding to (reference to rockets and the Wall).

2) The Wall: please stop with being in denial (is your statistic a truly scientific study? 95% v. 5%? Does it matter what it looks like anyways? Grow up!)

3) There is a border INTERNATIONALLY recognized by the UN. Israel has not recognized a border because since the day of its creation in 1948 its purpose was and still is (history speaks for itself) to grab as much land as possible. Recognizing a border only prevents them from stealing the land they so covet.

4) You are once again attempting to cloud facts with your reference to an "independent state". For people (including Jews) to call themselves Palestinians, and the Ottoman Empire recognizing Palestine and including representatives to it in its Parliament clearly indicates that there were Palestinians in the area israel now claims to be "disputed".

5) I dont remember you from undergrad, but by your post I can tell you are misinformed, thus you probably were the same at the time you claim I met you. No self-respecting Arab would have accepted the UN partition (the UN back then was basically the Allied powers) which gave over 50% of the land to a people that at the time owned less than 10% of it. And nothing of the past can be compared to today's reality. Today's reality is a symbol of the world's failure to prevent one of the worst injustices of our time.

Jason Coleman

posted 3/05/08 @ 9:05 PM EST

Muneer:

I did read all of the posts before I made mine. Your quote did not come out of context. The point is you purposefully conflated the issues of suicide bombings and (once those had been stopped) the shift in strategy to the launching of rockets from Gaza into Israeli cities.

On the issue of a "border," you completely ignore the fact that the Oslo Accords, Road Map, etc., specifically state that the final border will be mutually agreed upon by both sides. The Palestinians do not have sovereignty along the Green Line.

As for your assertion about what was given to Jews and what to Arabs in the Partition Plan, the following information comes from the UN report, which can be reached here: http://www.mideastweb.org/unscop1947.htm . The land given to the Jews had a majority-Jewish population but a significant Arab minority (45%). The Arab state, on the other hand, would have just a 1% Jewish population.

Dmitry Vitebsky

posted 3/05/08 @ 10:47 PM EST

Your denial of Hamas inflicting more damage to Palestinians than Israel is just that, denial. Why were they not recognized internationally? Because Hamas is a terrorist organization.

PLO all-star Yasser Arrafat has been funding and coordinating terrorism since the 60's. The Munich attacks being a prime example of setting back the Palestinian cause. If these organizations don't even recognize Israel's right to exist, where do you go from there? It becomes a war of attrition from 1945 until the end of time.

Years, decades go by. Both sides are brought to the negotiation table. Israel makes one concession after another (surely you can't argue that-just look at current borders compared to previous ones) and the violence never stops. So my question, Muneer, is this: If the ultimate goal for both sides is peace, which I truly hope it is, what is the best way of achieving that goal in the future?
Because clearly something hasn't been working.

No personal attacks, just some good ol' fashioned debate.

DV
  • Displaying 1 - 22 of 22

Post Your Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

 

 

Advertisement

Poll

Hmm, what to make of Kentucky vs. Georgia:
Submit Vote

View Results



Advertisement