Views vary on keynote speaker Thomas
Faculty to discuss issue in meeting
JOANN ANDERSON
Issue date: 4/22/08 Section: News
|
"After a year of revelations about decades of administrative passivity toward sexual harassment, the decision to invite Justice Clarence Thomas simply adds insult to injury," Pamela Voekel, associate professor of history, wrote in an e-mail Sunday.
"The upper administration, entirely male, is woefully out of touch with its majority female campus. Most of us on the faculty are old enough to remember Justice Thomas' confirmation hearings; Professor Anita Hill's testimony changed America, but apparently not [the University]," Voekel said.
During Thomas' 1991 Senate confirmation hearings for his appointment to the Supreme Court, it was alleged that Thomas had sexually harassed a former colleague, law professor Anita Hill. Hill testified during the hearings, and Thomas denied all allegations. Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court in October 1991 after a 52-48 Senate vote.
Some faculty plan to address the issue at the University Council meeting today, Janet Frick, associate professor of psychology, said in a phone interview Monday.
Frick said she would not be at the meeting but said, "I imagine [University President Michael] Adams is aware of the controversy that is going on. I don't know if President Adams or if faculty are planning statements."
"I hope it will provide a chance for people to let President Adams know just how little
this gesture is appreciated at this point in [the University's] history," Bethany Moreton, assistant professor of history and women's studies, said in a phone interview Monday. Moreton said she is planning to attend the University Council meeting today and said she had heard students were concerned and may plan to protest at graduation if Thomas is the speaker.
But some students reacted negatively Monday to The Red & Black's coverage of Thomas as speaker.
"Truthfully, as a conservative Republican at a liberal University, it kind of insulted me because we've had liberal speakers in the past," Eric Hauff, a junior from Augusta, said in a phone interview Monday. "I thought The Red & Black and [Chris Cuomo from] Women's Studies department maybe really took it a little too far and could be a little more appreciative of Mr. Thomas coming to the University instead of causing an uproar. Basically, I feel like it's trying to make an issue out of nothing simply to forward a cause for political agenda."
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 36
Janet Frick
posted 4/22/08 @ 6:43 AM EST
Thanks to the student writers at the red and black for their continued excellent media coverage. I'm glad that we are having a campus conversation about this; universities have historically been places where ideas are debated passionately. (Continued…)
Nick Ambrose
posted 4/22/08 @ 9:43 AM EST
I, for one, am very excited to have Justice Thomas speak at this year's commencement exercises. Its not because he and I have the same political viewpoint, its because his story is an inspiration to a new wave of graduates heading out into the world. (Continued…)
James
posted 4/22/08 @ 10:09 AM EST
It would be nice if some college professors would "grow up". Better yet, try to get a job in the private sector instead of playing "school" for your entire life. (Continued…)
Concerned Student
posted 4/22/08 @ 10:33 AM EST
For anyone interested in opposing or commenting on the fundamental arguments that Dr. Frick is making, please revisit your Intro to Logic textbook before posting. (Continued…)
Student
posted 4/22/08 @ 11:12 AM EST
I'm sorry, but James, do you even attend this school? If not, you really have no place in this debate. Ditto if you are not graduating or participating in graduation as a faculty member. (Continued…)
CoastalDawg
posted 4/22/08 @ 11:16 AM EST
Wow, I don't often make personal comments related to the posts of others but "Concerned Student" has my head swimming trying to find a logical and concluding point to the post. (Continued…)
zdawg8
posted 4/22/08 @ 11:19 AM EST
Justice Thomas has never been found guilty of perjury, obstruction of justice and especially sexual harrassment. Why attack him like he has been? How would Janet Frick like to be called false names? The whole deal is that she does not agree with him on his decisions and will believe anything bad about him. (Continued…)
Erica Crawford
posted 4/22/08 @ 11:41 AM EST
I am a graduating senior and I was pleased to hear that Supreme Court Justice Thomas was going to be speaking at my graduation. Yes, there were hearings back when I was a child, but he was not found guilty; and I feel that this being an issue today is to bring up an issue that has nothing to do with graduation. (Continued…)
Grad Student
posted 4/22/08 @ 12:38 PM EST
If timing were Dr. Frick's only concern, I could see the potential validity of her argument. But based upon the article it seems there may be other motivations for the opposition to Justice Clarence Thomas as a commencement speaker. (Continued…)
Brandon Register
posted 4/22/08 @ 2:11 PM EST
I just wish that the faculty who oppose the speech would be honest as to why they are opposed: because they are ultra liberal and Justice Thomas is a well-known conservative. (Continued…)
Post a Comment